In
recent decades a developmental approach to spirituality has emerged
from work in different research areas of adult development. “When
investigators of human development have written about 'higher' or more
adult stages of development they often indicate that such development
is spiritual” (Irwin, 2002, p. 3). Due to these being emergent findings
from research that was not aimed at measuring spiritual development,
the developmental theories involved do not include recognizably
spiritual aspects until the higher stages of development. The theories
have yet to adapt their understandings of earlier stages to include
this aspect of development that emerges strongly at later stages
(Irwin, 2002).

These stage-based developmental theories are
sometimes termed “neo-piagetian” because they are extensions of the
work done by Piaget on cognitive development in children. Piaget (1950)
found that children move through specific stages in how they understand
the world around them in the course of their development. The general
process of development he described as a process of “decentralization,”
a shifting from an egocentric perspective, in which the approach to
reality is inseparable from the perspective of the individual, to a
more objective perspective.
While Piaget's work ended with the
transition into a recognizably adult level of cognition, others have
continued to research development into adulthood. Looking at a spectrum
of this work, Irwin (2000) summarizes:
Whether we
examine moral development or psychosocial development or midlife
individuation, the descriptions of higher stages involve
characteristics that we can agree are spiritual. It is as if
development 'naturally' tends toward spiritual development. That is,
spirituality is part of normal or optimal development, and not
something unusual or even pathological. In fact, because these stages
typically occur in the latter years of life, coming after the earlier
stages, spirituality may be considered a higher or more evolved aspect
of normal development. We may regard developmental psychology as an
emerging psychology, revealing something about spirituality from a new
perspective (p. 290)

Even though the higher stages
of developmental theories are recognizably spiritual, there is no need
to follow Wilber (2000) in treating spirituality according to various
definitions as either consisting of these levels or as separate from
them. Just as we do not think of cognition as consisting of various
stages, nor of developing irrespective of stages, but rather as being
expressed within or through the framework of a given stage. At this
point in developmental theory, we may not have a term that applies to
the same element across all of the stages. For example, Irwin (2002)
uses the term “awareness” in the earliest stages, and in later stages
the term “consciousness.” For the definition of “consciousness” does
not apply in the earliest stages of development (p. 6). We must also
bear in mind that developmental stages represent not so much growth, as
transformation. This is in fact the distinction between development
within a stage, and development to a further stage. The passive state
of awareness may grow indefinitely and never attain the active
properties of consciousness. If consciousness develops from awareness,
then that development is a transformation from one type into another.
This
transformational aspect may apply to spirituality. It may be that what
is readily recognizable as spirituality in later stages, is not
recognizable or definable as spirituality in earlier stages. However,
in the range of stages we will be considering, we will be treating
spirituality in much the same way as cognition, as something that is
expressed within or through a stage, not dependent on it.
Spiritual and
ego Development
Stages
are generally considered in three major categories:
preconventional, the stages identified in child development by Piaget;
conventional, stages that represent psychosocial development within the
range of normal adult function; and postconventional, that describe
further development in awareness of the systems involved in the
construction of meaning and their innate limitations. Hewlett (2002)
includes a further category of transcendent stages. “In this final
tier, the separate ego is simply the vehicle through which this deeper
reality flows” (p. 34-35).
While there are some differences in
the theories of ego development, these can largely be accounted for by
differences in the focuses of the theories. For example: Loevinger
(1976) and Cook-Greutner (1994, 1999, 2004) worked from measures of
meaning-making such as self-understanding; Kegan (1994) focused more on
unconscious epistemologies; and Washburn (2003) considered intrapsychic
relations and structure as well as relations to body and world. These
developmental theories, and the less-encompassing theories of
reflective judgment development (King & Kitchner, 1994), moral
development (Kohlberg, in King & Kitchner, 1994; & in Irwin,
2002), and faith development (Fowler, 1981), all follow the same
structure of “an invariant, hierarchical sequence of distinct views of
reality and subject-object integrations which comprise operative,
cognitive, and emotional aspects of living” (Cook-Greuter, 1994, p.
121). These stages are not merely progressive, subsequent stages
include and increase the perspectives of prior stages.
Growth is
not only associated with transitioning to a higher stage. As
Cook-Greuter has pointed out, most growth seems to occur within a given
stage, “The current ways of viewing reality is refined, enriched, and
modified” (p. 120). We can distinguish between growth as change within
the framework of a stage, and as transformation in a transition from
the current framework to a higher-stage framework.
----
References:
Cook-Greuter, S. (1994). Rare forms of self-understanding in mature adults. In M. Miller & S. Cook-Greuter (Eds.), Transcendence and mature thought in adulthood: Further reaches of adult development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cook-Greuter, S. R. (1999) Postautonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Ed.D. dissertation, Harvard University, United States -- Massachusetts.
Cook-Greuter, S. (2004). Making the case for a developmental perspective. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(6/7), 275-281.
Fowler, J. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. New York: Harper Collins.
Hewlett, D. C. (2004). A qualitative study of postautonomous ego development: The bridge between postconventional and transcendent ways of being. Ph.D. dissertation, Fielding Graduate Institute, United States -- California.
Irwin, R. (2000). Meditation and the evolution of consciousness in M. Miller & A. West (Eds.), Spirituality, ethics, and relationships in adulthood: Clinical and theoretical explorations. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
Irwin, R. (2002). Human development and the spiritual life: How consciousness grows toward transformation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
King, P. & Kitchner, K. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Routledge.
Washburn, M. (2003). Embodied spirituality in a sacred world. Albany: SUNY Press.
Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Boston: Shambhala.